AVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Idacorp has a net margin of 4.7% compared to Avista's net margin of 21.5%. Avista's return on equity of 7.9% beat Idacorp's return on equity of 9.27%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand Idacorp has an analysts' consensus of $117.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Idacorp, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Idacorp.

Avista has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idacorp has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.838%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Idacorp offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Avista pays 82.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Idacorp pays out 62.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $393.7M, which are smaller than Idacorp quarterly revenues of $528.5M. Avista's net income of $18.5M is lower than Idacorp's net income of $113.6M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.30x while Idacorp's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.47x versus 3.08x for Idacorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail has a net margin of 4.7% compared to Avista's net margin of 25.29%. Avista's return on equity of 7.9% beat Otter Tail's return on equity of 20.19%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand Otter Tail has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.46%. Given that Otter Tail has higher upside potential than Avista, analysts believe Otter Tail is more attractive than Avista.

Avista has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.978%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Otter Tail offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Avista pays 82.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $393.7M, which are larger than Otter Tail quarterly revenues of $338M. Avista's net income of $18.5M is lower than Otter Tail's net income of $85.5M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.30x while Otter Tail's PE ratio is 10.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.47x versus 2.32x for Otter Tail. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinnacle West Capital has a net margin of 4.7% compared to Avista's net margin of 22.33%. Avista's return on equity of 7.9% beat Pinnacle West Capital's return on equity of 9.58%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand Pinnacle West Capital has an analysts' consensus of $93.07 which suggests that it could grow by 11.86%. Given that Pinnacle West Capital has higher upside potential than Avista, analysts believe Pinnacle West Capital is more attractive than Avista.

Avista has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinnacle West Capital has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.918%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Pinnacle West Capital offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Avista pays 82.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital pays out 77.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $393.7M, which are smaller than Pinnacle West Capital quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Avista's net income of $18.5M is lower than Pinnacle West Capital's net income of $395M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.30x while Pinnacle West Capital's PE ratio is 15.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.47x versus 1.91x for Pinnacle West Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of 4.7% compared to Avista's net margin of --. Avista's return on equity of 7.9% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Avista has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avista pays 82.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avista's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $393.7M, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Avista's net income of $18.5M is higher than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$777.7K. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.30x while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.47x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.