BC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 3.5% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.94%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.32% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -14.12%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.27%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $42.13 which suggests that it could grow by 26.71%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than Malibu Boats, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than Malibu Boats.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.357%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $171.6M. Brunswick's net income of $44.6M is higher than Malibu Boats's net income of -$5M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.81x versus 1.02x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a net margin of 3.5% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -7.87%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.32% beat MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -1.88%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.27%. On the other hand MasterCraft Boat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.83 which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than MasterCraft Boat Holdings, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than MasterCraft Boat Holdings.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.668, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.788%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues of $65.4M. Brunswick's net income of $44.6M is higher than MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while MasterCraft Boat Holdings's PE ratio is 42.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.81x versus 0.97x for MasterCraft Boat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Products has a net margin of 3.5% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 6.83%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.32% beat Marine Products's return on equity of 13.37%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.27%. On the other hand Marine Products has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could fall by -12.57%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than Marine Products.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Products has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.449%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Marine Products offers a yield of 6.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brunswick pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products pays out 46.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Marine Products quarterly revenues of $49.9M. Brunswick's net income of $44.6M is higher than Marine Products's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Marine Products's PE ratio is 17.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.81x versus 1.19x for Marine Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Lighting Group has a net margin of 3.5% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -223.31%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.32% beat US Lighting Group's return on equity of --.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.27%. On the other hand US Lighting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than US Lighting Group, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than US Lighting Group.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.535, which suggesting that the stock is 53.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Lighting Group has a beta of 2.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.018%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. US Lighting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. US Lighting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than US Lighting Group quarterly revenues of $151.8K. Brunswick's net income of $44.6M is higher than US Lighting Group's net income of -$339K. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while US Lighting Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.81x versus 0.40x for US Lighting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.