BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chart Industries has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of 4.94%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Chart Industries's return on equity of 8.5%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.45, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand Chart Industries has an analysts' consensus of $212.67 which suggests that it could grow by 40.61%. Given that Bloom Energy has higher upside potential than Chart Industries, analysts believe Bloom Energy is more attractive than Chart Industries.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chart Industries has a beta of 1.691, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.089%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chart Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Chart Industries pays out 12.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Chart Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are smaller than Chart Industries quarterly revenues of $1B. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than Chart Industries's net income of $49.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chart Industries's PE ratio is 30.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.39x versus 1.66x for Chart Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -697.46%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.45, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.15 which suggests that it could grow by 172.33%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.686%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.39x versus 0.98x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPI Composites has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -13.88%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.45, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of $3.14 which suggests that it could grow by 229.15%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 2.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.107%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are smaller than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $346.5M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.39x versus 0.03x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of 1.02%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.45, signalling upside risk potential of 43.49%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.95%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.099%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $89.9M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than Twin Disc's net income of $919K. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.39x versus 0.30x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.