BHP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 166.16%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than BHP Group.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.39x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 1.99x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 20.21%.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $78.69 which suggests that it could grow by 43.63%. Given that Rio Tinto PLC has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Rio Tinto PLC is more attractive than BHP Group.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.660, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.951%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 60.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.39x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 7.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 1.99x versus 1.66x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern Copper has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of 28.51%. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Southern Copper's return on equity of 40.32%.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Southern Copper has an analysts' consensus of $99.14 which suggests that it could grow by 26.4%. Given that Southern Copper has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Southern Copper is more attractive than BHP Group.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern Copper has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.433%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Southern Copper offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern Copper pays out 48.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Southern Copper quarterly revenues of $2.8B. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Southern Copper's net income of $793.9M. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.39x while Southern Copper's PE ratio is 18.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 1.99x versus 5.42x for Southern Copper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vale SA has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of -6.86%. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Vale SA's return on equity of 15.97%.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Vale SA has an analysts' consensus of $12.73 which suggests that it could grow by 40.21%. Given that Vale SA has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Vale SA is more attractive than BHP Group.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vale SA has a beta of 0.719, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.125%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Vale SA offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Vale SA pays out 63.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vale SA quarterly revenues of $10.1B. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Vale SA's net income of -$694M. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.39x while Vale SA's PE ratio is 6.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 1.99x versus 1.02x for Vale SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.