BOOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Foot Locker has a net margin of 12.34% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 2.18%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $159.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.83%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $17.38 which suggests that it could grow by 46.55%. Given that Foot Locker has higher upside potential than Boot Barn Holdings, analysts believe Foot Locker is more attractive than Boot Barn Holdings.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.769% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.96%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $608.2M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of $49M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Foot Locker's PE ratio is 91.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 1.87x versus 0.14x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordstrom has a net margin of 12.34% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 3.84%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48% beat Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.99%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $159.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.83%. On the other hand Nordstrom has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.07%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.769% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordstrom has a beta of 2.362, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.225%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordstrom offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom pays out 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $608.2M, which are smaller than Nordstrom quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M is lower than Nordstrom's net income of $166M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Nordstrom's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 1.87x versus 0.27x for Nordstrom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 12.34% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 5.58%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48% beat Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 11.96%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $159.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.83%. On the other hand Shoe Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.58%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Shoe Carnival, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Shoe Carnival.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.769% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.907%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoe Carnival offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival pays out 19.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $608.2M, which are larger than Shoe Carnival quarterly revenues of $262.9M. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M is higher than Shoe Carnival's net income of $14.7M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Shoe Carnival's PE ratio is 6.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 1.87x versus 0.41x for Shoe Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 12.34% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 5.17%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $159.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.83%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $54.37 which suggests that it could grow by 6.7%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.769% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.661%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $608.2M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 25.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 1.87x versus 1.83x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.