Financhill
Buy
66

CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$119.27
Seasonality move :
4.34%
Day range:
$118.60 - $130.21
52-week range:
$40.02 - $144.27
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
31.89x
P/S ratio:
1.47x
P/B ratio:
7.30x
Volume:
4.4M
Avg. volume:
5.2M
1-year change:
220.56%
Market cap:
$13.8B
Revenue:
$9.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.74

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLS
Celestica
$2.6B $1.16 16% 31.44% $144.10
DELL
Dell Technologies
$23.6B $1.81 10.05% 52.74% $148.88
HPQ
HP
$13B $0.85 1.25% 19.56% $36.19
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$3M -$5.41 118.73% -99.59% --
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
-- -- -- -- --
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$1.3B $3.54 9.78% 62.16% $391.60
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLS
Celestica
$119.25 $144.10 $13.8B 31.89x $0.00 0% 1.47x
DELL
Dell Technologies
$117.60 $148.88 $82.4B 20.59x $0.45 1.51% 0.91x
HPQ
HP
$34.63 $36.19 $32.5B 12.32x $0.29 3.22% 0.64x
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$3.22 -- $1.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.19x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$1.69 -- $8.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.03x
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$311.05 $391.60 $16B 30.56x $0.00 0% 3.24x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLS
Celestica
29.59% 1.798 7.43% 0.83x
DELL
Dell Technologies
110.05% 0.905 28.8% 0.43x
HPQ
HP
115.85% 1.536 28.99% 0.40x
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
26.36% -1.735 122.04% 0.36x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
50.16% 11.504 426.14% 0.18x
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
37.71% 0.605 10.91% 0.95x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLS
Celestica
$297.2M $204.7M 16.94% 24.71% 7.91% $27.3M
DELL
Dell Technologies
$5.3B $1.7B 17.81% -- 7.06% $914M
HPQ
HP
$3B $1.1B 33.28% -- 7.18% $1.5B
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$1.7M -$3.8M -197.89% -252.61% -1.69% -$7.6M
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$1.6M -$1.9M -193.52% -275.7% -57.72% -$1.1M
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$648M $228M 9.67% 16% 20.02% $288M

Celestica vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or DELL?

    Dell Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 4.65%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Dell Technologies's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    21.78% $1.58 $22.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or DELL?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.84%. On the other hand Dell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $148.88 which suggests that it could grow by 26.6%. Given that Dell Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Dell Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    6 1 0
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    13 3 0
  • Is CLS or DELL More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.606%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or DELL?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dell Technologies offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies pays out 33.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or DELL?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies quarterly revenues of $24.4B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than Dell Technologies's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.89x while Dell Technologies's PE ratio is 20.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.47x versus 0.91x for Dell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.47x 31.89x $2.5B $151.7M
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    0.91x 20.59x $24.4B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or HPQ?

    HP has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.45%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat HP's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    HPQ
    HP
    21.35% $0.93 $8.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.84%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $36.19 which suggests that it could grow by 4.52%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than HP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    6 1 0
    HPQ
    HP
    2 12 1
  • Is CLS or HPQ More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.153%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than HP's net income of $906M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.89x while HP's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.47x versus 0.64x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.47x 31.89x $2.5B $151.7M
    HPQ
    HP
    0.64x 12.32x $14.1B $906M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or SYTA?

    Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -10.68%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    29.04% -$0.22 $13.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.84%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38894.32%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    6 1 0
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    0 1 0
  • Is CLS or SYTA More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.57%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.89x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.47x versus 0.19x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.47x 31.89x $2.5B $151.7M
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    0.19x -- $5.9M -$626.3K
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or UAVS?

    AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    49.75% -$16.03 $12.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.84%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1009.47%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    6 1 0
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is CLS or UAVS More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.45%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.89x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.47x versus 0.03x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.47x 31.89x $2.5B $151.7M
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0.03x -- $3.3M -$3.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or ZBRA?

    Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 12.22%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    48.58% $3.14 $5.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.84%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $391.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.9%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    6 1 0
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    8 10 0
  • Is CLS or ZBRA More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.128%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.89x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 30.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.47x versus 3.24x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.47x 31.89x $2.5B $151.7M
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    3.24x 30.56x $1.3B $163M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will AMD Beat the S&P 500?
Will AMD Beat the S&P 500?

High-performance and adaptive computing leader Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is…

Why Did Walmart Stock Fall?
Why Did Walmart Stock Fall?

Walmart (NYSE:WMT) tumbled in spite of strong Q4 results that…

Is Cadence Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Cadence Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) has seen its stock move sharply…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Sell
48
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Sell
2
GLOB alert for Feb 22

Globant SA [GLOB] is down 27.81% over the past day.

Sell
42
CELH alert for Feb 22

Celsius Holdings [CELH] is up 27.77% over the past day.

Buy
60
HIMS alert for Feb 22

Hims & Hers Health [HIMS] is down 25.64% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock