CRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expand Energy has a net margin of -23.65% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of -11.34%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -13.7% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -7.49%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $18.23, signalling downside risk potential of -15.52%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.04 which suggests that it could grow by 14.31%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.278% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Comstock Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $512.9M, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Comstock Resources's net income of -$121.3M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$249M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.38x versus 3.71x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of -23.65% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 23.86%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -13.7% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.13%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $18.23, signalling downside risk potential of -15.52%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $63.53 which suggests that it could grow by 57.52%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.278% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.147%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Comstock Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $512.9M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $1B. Comstock Resources's net income of -$121.3M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $240.1M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.38x versus 1.37x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of -23.65% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 23.95%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -13.7% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 29.16%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $18.23, signalling downside risk potential of -15.52%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $36.14 which suggests that it could grow by 47.8%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.278% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.293%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 6.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Comstock Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $512.9M, which are smaller than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $580.3M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$121.3M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $139M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 3.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.38x versus 1.12x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of -23.65% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 6.78%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -13.7% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $18.23, signalling downside risk potential of -15.52%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 303.49%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.278% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.456%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $512.9M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$121.3M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.38x versus 0.47x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.