DDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -18.51%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat GoPro's return on equity of -166.14%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 104.92%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 19.79%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than GoPro.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.294% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.856%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $200.9M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.55x versus 0.10x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 3.26%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 104.92%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 74.75%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Immersion, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Immersion.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.294% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.639%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.55x versus 0.18x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -27.9%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 104.92%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.17%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Stratasys.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.294% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.121%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $150.4M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.55x versus 1.13x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -77.77%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -26.59%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 104.92%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 92.86%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Transact Technologies, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Transact Technologies.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.294% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.657%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.2M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of -$8M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.55x versus 0.81x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.