DOCN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BM Technologies has a net margin of 16.6% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of -35.48%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat BM Technologies's return on equity of -45.36%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.6%. On the other hand BM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.88%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than BM Technologies, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than BM Technologies.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BM Technologies has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.585%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $198.5M, which are larger than BM Technologies quarterly revenues of $14.1M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $32.9M is higher than BM Technologies's net income of -$5M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while BM Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 4.42x versus 0.99x for BM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 16.6% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of -11.03%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.6%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.17%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than Castellum.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $198.5M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $32.9M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 4.42x versus 1.43x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enfusion has a net margin of 16.6% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of 2.77%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Enfusion's return on equity of 3.97%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.6%. On the other hand Enfusion has an analysts' consensus of $9.89 which suggests that it could fall by -2.63%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than Enfusion.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enfusion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enfusion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $198.5M, which are larger than Enfusion quarterly revenues of $51.2M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $32.9M is higher than Enfusion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Enfusion's PE ratio is 254.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 4.42x versus 6.18x for Enfusion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MongoDB has a net margin of 16.6% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of -1.85%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MongoDB's return on equity of -16.23%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.6%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $376.90 which suggests that it could grow by 53.24%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.568%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $198.5M, which are smaller than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $529.4M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $32.9M is higher than MongoDB's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 4.42x versus 9.41x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.