DTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EnLink Midstream LLC has a net margin of 35.48% compared to DT Midstream's net margin of 0.88%. DT Midstream's return on equity of 9.35% beat EnLink Midstream LLC's return on equity of 5.38%.

DT Midstream has a consensus price target of $93.77, signalling downside risk potential of -2.82%. On the other hand EnLink Midstream LLC has an analysts' consensus of $15.36 which suggests that it could grow by 6.03%. Given that EnLink Midstream LLC has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, analysts believe EnLink Midstream LLC is more attractive than DT Midstream.

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnLink Midstream LLC has a beta of 2.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 143.094%.

DT Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. EnLink Midstream LLC offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. DT Midstream pays 68.49% of its earnings as a dividend. EnLink Midstream LLC pays out 114.55% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EnLink Midstream LLC's is not.

DT Midstream quarterly revenues are $248M, which are smaller than EnLink Midstream LLC quarterly revenues of $1.6B. DT Midstream's net income of $88M is higher than EnLink Midstream LLC's net income of $14M. Notably, DT Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.73x while EnLink Midstream LLC's PE ratio is 69.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream is 10.60x versus 0.99x for EnLink Midstream LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 35.48% compared to DT Midstream's net margin of 5.7%. DT Midstream's return on equity of 9.35% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37%.

DT Midstream has a consensus price target of $93.77, signalling downside risk potential of -2.82%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.79 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than DT Midstream.

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.246%.

DT Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 6.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. DT Midstream pays 68.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

DT Midstream quarterly revenues are $248M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $20.8B. DT Midstream's net income of $88M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B. Notably, DT Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.73x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream is 10.60x versus 0.80x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 35.48% compared to DT Midstream's net margin of 23.73%. DT Midstream's return on equity of 9.35% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 42.31%.

DT Midstream has a consensus price target of $93.77, signalling downside risk potential of -2.82%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $230.32 which suggests that it could grow by 2.28%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than DT Midstream.

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.439%.

DT Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. DT Midstream pays 68.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream quarterly revenues are $248M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $3.8B. DT Midstream's net income of $88M is lower than Cheniere Energy's net income of $893M. Notably, DT Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.73x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 14.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream is 10.60x versus 3.25x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ONEOK has a net margin of 35.48% compared to DT Midstream's net margin of 13.8%. DT Midstream's return on equity of 9.35% beat ONEOK's return on equity of 16.9%.

DT Midstream has a consensus price target of $93.77, signalling downside risk potential of -2.82%. On the other hand ONEOK has an analysts' consensus of $110.59 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that ONEOK has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, analysts believe ONEOK is more attractive than DT Midstream.

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ONEOK has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.747%.

DT Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. ONEOK offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. DT Midstream pays 68.49% of its earnings as a dividend. ONEOK pays out 69.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream quarterly revenues are $248M, which are smaller than ONEOK quarterly revenues of $5B. DT Midstream's net income of $88M is lower than ONEOK's net income of $693M. Notably, DT Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.73x while ONEOK's PE ratio is 21.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream is 10.60x versus 3.02x for ONEOK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.