EIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 44.89%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.925%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.7M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.11x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 35.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.36x versus 5.60x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 6.77%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $96.60 which suggests that it could fall by -25.04%. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.11x while Root's PE ratio is 75.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.36x versus 1.74x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 4.73%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.11x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 17.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.36x versus 1.86x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 39.38%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Employers Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Employers Holdings.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.468%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.11x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.36x versus 1.24x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.