Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
28
FBIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$68.24
Seasonality move
:
2.16%
Day range:
$67.45 - $70.04
52-week range:
$62.54 - $90.54
Dividend yield:
1.38%
P/E ratio:
19.54x
P/S ratio:
1.88x
P/B ratio:
3.60x
Volume:
2.1M
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
-9.32%
Market cap:
$8.6B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.55
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$1.1B | $1.05 | -0.94% | 65.39% | $88.25 |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NX
Quanex Building Products
|
$491.9M | $0.56 | 60.98% | 5.26% | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$69.37 | $88.25 | $8.6B | 19.54x | $0.24 | 1.38% | 1.88x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
$15.80 | -- | $15.3M | -- | $0.03 | 2.09% | 0.51x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
$4.54 | -- | $59M | 3.31x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.68x |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
$27.68 | -- | $77.2M | 11.25x | $0.25 | 3.16% | 1.75x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
$4.25 | -- | $4.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
NX
Quanex Building Products
|
$22.69 | -- | $1.1B | 20.26x | $0.08 | 1.41% | 0.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
53.69% | 1.123 | 24.94% | 0.59x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
-- | -0.163 | -- | 2.68x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
42.08% | -0.753 | 40.73% | 1.55x |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
-- | -0.251 | -- | 2.01x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
97.85% | 1.455 | 1339.66% | 0.16x |
|
NX
Quanex Building Products
|
43.02% | 1.488 | 55.56% | 1.10x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$529.8M | $212.5M | 8.71% | 19.45% | 17.89% | $175.6M |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
$695K | -$823.6K | -13.89% | -13.89% | -11.82% | -$368.9K |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
$4.2M | $1.5M | 43.19% | 84.62% | 7.61% | $586.9K |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
$2.8M | $1.7M | 15.95% | 15.95% | 16.46% | $724.8K |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
$8.5M | -$12.8M | -108.68% | -281.97% | -77.39% | $2.8M |
|
NX
Quanex Building Products
|
$117.1M | $2.8M | 3.92% | 5.05% | 0.03% | -$8.2M |
Fortune Brands Innovations vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVR?
Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -20.76%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B CVRChicago Rivet & Machine9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $88.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 CVRChicago Rivet & Machine0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVR More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.51x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.54x $1.2B $136.6M CVRChicago Rivet & Machine0.51x -- $7M -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVU?
CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 3.86%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B CVUCPI Aerostructures21.73% $0.06 $43.1M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $88.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.89%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 CVUCPI Aerostructures0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVU More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.339%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 3.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.68x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.54x $1.2B $136.6M CVUCPI Aerostructures0.68x 3.31x $19.4M $749.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or ESP?
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 15.31%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 15.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics26.82% $0.61 $42.5M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $88.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.68%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or ESP More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.51%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.4M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 1.75x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.54x $1.2B $136.6M ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics1.75x 11.25x $10.4M $1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or GPUS?
Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -82.25%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B GPUSHyperscale Data27.51% -$24.85 $126.9M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $88.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12352865.88%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 GPUSHyperscale Data0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or GPUS More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 243.524%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.54x $1.2B $136.6M GPUSHyperscale Data0.02x -- $31.1M -$25.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or NX?
Quanex Building Products has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -2.83%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 5.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B NXQuanex Building Products23.78% -$0.30 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or NX?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $88.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60.13%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 NXQuanex Building Products1 0 0 -
Is FBIN or NX More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.61%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or NX?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or NX?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $492.2M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.65x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.54x $1.2B $136.6M NXQuanex Building Products0.65x 20.26x $492.2M -$13.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 9.65% over the past day.
Sell
45
COLL alert for Jan 10
Collegium Pharmaceutical [COLL] is down 1.2% over the past day.
Sell
30
EDN alert for Jan 10
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA [EDN] is down 1.66% over the past day.
