FERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 15.25%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.71, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.28 which suggests that it could fall by -5.05%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.211%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.7M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 39.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.15x versus 5.99x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 9.24%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.71, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $500.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.884%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 26.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.15x versus 2.14x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 8.47%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 38.3%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.71, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.7%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $834M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $70.7M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 20.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.15x versus 1.63x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 10.61%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.71, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $164.25 which suggests that it could grow by 9.97%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.045%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $482.6M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.04x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 34.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.15x versus 3.52x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.