FERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 15.61%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $218.06, signalling upside risk potential of 26.77%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.71 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.268%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 36.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.17x versus 5.60x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 8.07%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 33.79%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $218.06, signalling upside risk potential of 26.77%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $534.40 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.633%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $146.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 34.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.17x versus 2.47x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 8.14%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $218.06, signalling upside risk potential of 26.77%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.17x versus 1.56x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 10.38%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $218.06, signalling upside risk potential of 26.77%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $173.60 which suggests that it could grow by 21.23%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.763%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $483.7M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 38.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.17x versus 3.50x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.