FSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -161.83%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $101.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federal Signal has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Federal Signal is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.86900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.201%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.12x versus 11.67x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 13.62%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.13%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $101.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $327.60 which suggests that it could grow by 13.55%. Given that RBC Bearings has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe RBC Bearings is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.86900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.309%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $397.9M. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is lower than RBC Bearings's net income of $54.2M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 43.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.12x versus 5.48x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 4.92%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.33%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $101.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $203.18 which suggests that it could grow by 30.92%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.86900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.86599999999999%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out -161.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 48.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.12x versus 1.67x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -15.94%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.79%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $101.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 238.49%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.86900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.531%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$443K. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.12x versus 0.35x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.