FUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flamemaster has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat Flamemaster's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand Flamemaster has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Flamemaster, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Flamemaster.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flamemaster has a beta of -0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.752%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Flamemaster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Flamemaster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are larger than Flamemaster quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is higher than Flamemaster's net income of --. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while Flamemaster's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.83x versus -- for Flamemaster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of -12.93%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat PPG Industries's return on equity of 14.3%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand PPG Industries has an analysts' consensus of $125.64 which suggests that it could grow by 27.66%. Given that PPG Industries has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe PPG Industries is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.905%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. PPG Industries offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries pays out 55.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are smaller than PPG Industries quarterly revenues of $2.2B. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is higher than PPG Industries's net income of -$280M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while PPG Industries's PE ratio is 20.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.83x versus 1.46x for PPG Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perimeter Solutions has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of -30.92%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat Perimeter Solutions's return on equity of -0.54%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand Perimeter Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.45%. Given that Perimeter Solutions has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Perimeter Solutions is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perimeter Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Perimeter Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Perimeter Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are larger than Perimeter Solutions quarterly revenues of $86.2M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is lower than Perimeter Solutions's net income of $144.2M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while Perimeter Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.83x versus 2.62x for Perimeter Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPM International has a net margin of 1.68% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 3.52%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24% beat RPM International's return on equity of 24.93%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand RPM International has an analysts' consensus of $119.20 which suggests that it could grow by 15.54%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.843%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. RPM International offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $788.7M, which are smaller than RPM International quarterly revenues of $1.5B. H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M is lower than RPM International's net income of $52M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while RPM International's PE ratio is 20.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.83x versus 1.81x for RPM International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.