GEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of -2.72%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $407.59, signalling downside risk potential of -5.83%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 140.96%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.37x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 31.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 3.37x versus 0.26x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of 1.78%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $407.59, signalling downside risk potential of -5.83%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 503.77%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.36%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.37x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 3.37x versus 0.67x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of -814.55%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $407.59, signalling downside risk potential of -5.83%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GE Vernova has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe GE Vernova is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.37x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 3.37x versus 9.30x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of -11.09%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $407.59, signalling downside risk potential of -5.83%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 275.53%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.37x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 3.37x versus 0.25x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.