GGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of 0.21%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

Graco has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 144.14%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.872%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.08x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.65x versus 0.27x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crane has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of 12.94%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat Crane's return on equity of 18.51%.

Graco has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Crane offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are smaller than Crane quarterly revenues of $597.2M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than Crane's net income of $77.3M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.08x while Crane's PE ratio is 33.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.65x versus 3.92x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of -161.83%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Graco has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graco has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Graco is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Graco has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.201%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.08x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.65x versus 11.67x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of -15.94%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.79%.

Graco has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 238.49%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.531%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$443K. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.08x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.65x versus 0.35x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.