HLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyatt Hotels has a net margin of 12% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 28.91%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hyatt Hotels's return on equity of 37.51%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $241.88, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Hyatt Hotels has an analysts' consensus of $163.66 which suggests that it could grow by 4.7%. Given that Hyatt Hotels has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Hyatt Hotels is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.516%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Hyatt Hotels offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyatt Hotels pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Hyatt Hotels quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $344M is lower than Hyatt Hotels's net income of $471M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Hyatt Hotels's PE ratio is 11.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.65x versus 2.44x for Hyatt Hotels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Grand Vacations has a net margin of 12% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 2.22%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hilton Grand Vacations's return on equity of 4.53%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $241.88, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Hilton Grand Vacations has an analysts' consensus of $45.89 which suggests that it could grow by 17.34%. Given that Hilton Grand Vacations has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Hilton Grand Vacations is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Grand Vacations has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.681%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Hilton Grand Vacations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Grand Vacations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Hilton Grand Vacations quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $344M is higher than Hilton Grand Vacations's net income of $29M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Hilton Grand Vacations's PE ratio is 43.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.65x versus 0.85x for Hilton Grand Vacations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 12% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 9.34%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $241.88, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $277.20 which suggests that it could grow by 1%. Given that Marriott International has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Marriott International is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.457%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Marriott International offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 19.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $344M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $584M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 28.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.65x versus 3.21x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vail Resorts has a net margin of 12% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of -66.41%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Vail Resorts's return on equity of 22.48%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $241.88, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Vail Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $200.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.32%. Given that Vail Resorts has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Vail Resorts is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vail Resorts has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.158%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Vail Resorts offers a yield of 5.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.22 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Vail Resorts pays out 140.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Vail Resorts's is not.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Vail Resorts quarterly revenues of $260.3M. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $344M is higher than Vail Resorts's net income of -$172.8M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Vail Resorts's PE ratio is 29.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.65x versus 2.29x for Vail Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.