KVYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of 43.65%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $44.03, signalling upside risk potential of 34.13%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $432.90 which suggests that it could grow by 40.75%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than Klaviyo, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than Klaviyo.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $599.2M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AppLovin's PE ratio is 67.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 9.33x versus 22.72x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of -26.62%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $44.03, signalling upside risk potential of 34.13%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 210.82%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Klaviyo, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Klaviyo.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 498.483%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 9.33x versus 1.22x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Samsara has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of -3.24%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Samsara's return on equity of -15.9%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $44.03, signalling upside risk potential of 34.13%. On the other hand Samsara has an analysts' consensus of $47.06 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Samsara, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Samsara.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samsara has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samsara offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samsara pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Samsara quarterly revenues of $346.3M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Samsara's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Samsara's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 9.33x versus 18.43x for Samsara. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of 9.55%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $44.03, signalling upside risk potential of 34.13%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $87.05 which suggests that it could fall by -29.96%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 654.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 9.33x versus 106.29x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.