LDOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of -15.28%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.21, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 170096.64%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$419.7K. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.36x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.16x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 16.6%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.21, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $254.04 which suggests that it could grow by 7.88%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.796%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Business Machines's is not.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $17.6B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.36x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 36.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.16x versus 3.50x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gartner has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 23.24%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Gartner's return on equity of 140.26%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.21, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand Gartner has an analysts' consensus of $515.32 which suggests that it could grow by 28.87%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gartner has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.975%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Gartner offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Gartner pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Gartner quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is lower than Gartner's net income of $398.6M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.36x while Gartner's PE ratio is 24.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.16x versus 5.00x for Gartner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 5.33%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.21, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.85%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.891%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is higher than Science Applications International's net income of $98M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.36x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 16.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.16x versus 0.79x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.