LII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 1.54%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $622.71, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.31%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.644%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $135.5M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.70x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 96.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.35x versus 2.08x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 1.02%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $622.71, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 292.16%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 310.317%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $7.9M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of $80K. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.70x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.35x versus 1.19x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 5.59%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $622.71, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.176%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.9M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.70x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 44.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.35x versus 2.26x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 14.19%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 35.05%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $622.71, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of $414.18 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that Trane Technologies PLC has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Trane Technologies PLC is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.718%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Lennox International's net income of $239M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $772M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.70x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 35.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.35x versus 4.56x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.