MGM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of 3.62% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 11.19%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 18.81% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4%.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $49.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.86%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $57.42 which suggests that it could grow by 70.23%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than MGM Resorts International, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than MGM Resorts International.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.960, which suggesting that the stock is 95.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.668%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $157.4M is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.54x versus 2.20x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 3.62% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 7.08%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 18.81% beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $49.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.86%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $285.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.4%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Marriott International, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Marriott International.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.960, which suggesting that the stock is 95.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.611%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marriott International offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.4B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $157.4M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $455M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 28.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.54x versus 2.66x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PENN Entertainment has a net margin of 3.62% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of -7.99%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 18.81% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity of -10.23%.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $49.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.86%. On the other hand PENN Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $23.28 which suggests that it could grow by 43.01%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than PENN Entertainment, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than PENN Entertainment.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.960, which suggesting that the stock is 95.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PENN Entertainment has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.887%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PENN Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PENN Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than PENN Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.7B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $157.4M is higher than PENN Entertainment's net income of -$133.3M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while PENN Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.54x versus 0.38x for PENN Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 3.62% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 15.06%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 18.81% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $49.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.86%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $111.92 which suggests that it could grow by 47.6%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Wynn Resorts, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Wynn Resorts.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.960, which suggesting that the stock is 95.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.494%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $157.4M is lower than Wynn Resorts's net income of $277M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 18.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.54x versus 1.17x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.