MNSO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 17.1% compared to MINISO Group Holding's net margin of 3.35%. MINISO Group Holding's return on equity of 27.24% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

MINISO Group Holding has a consensus price target of $24.51, signalling upside risk potential of 42.33%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 91.33%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than MINISO Group Holding, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than MINISO Group Holding.

MINISO Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

MINISO Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. MINISO Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MINISO Group Holding quarterly revenues are $655M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. MINISO Group Holding's net income of $112M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, MINISO Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.64x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MINISO Group Holding is 2.26x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of 17.1% compared to MINISO Group Holding's net margin of 0.81%. MINISO Group Holding's return on equity of 27.24% beat H World Group's return on equity of 24.59%.

MINISO Group Holding has a consensus price target of $24.51, signalling upside risk potential of 42.33%. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.53 which suggests that it could grow by 28.97%. Given that MINISO Group Holding has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe MINISO Group Holding is more attractive than H World Group.

MINISO Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.938%.

MINISO Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. MINISO Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

MINISO Group Holding quarterly revenues are $655M, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $837.1M. MINISO Group Holding's net income of $112M is higher than H World Group's net income of $6.8M. Notably, MINISO Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.64x while H World Group's PE ratio is 25.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MINISO Group Holding is 2.26x versus 3.37x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of 17.1% compared to MINISO Group Holding's net margin of -13.73%. MINISO Group Holding's return on equity of 27.24% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

MINISO Group Holding has a consensus price target of $24.51, signalling upside risk potential of 42.33%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 323.73%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than MINISO Group Holding, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than MINISO Group Holding.

MINISO Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.258%.

MINISO Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MINISO Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MINISO Group Holding quarterly revenues are $655M, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. MINISO Group Holding's net income of $112M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, MINISO Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.64x while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MINISO Group Holding is 2.26x versus 0.75x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 17.1% compared to MINISO Group Holding's net margin of -36.2%. MINISO Group Holding's return on equity of 27.24% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

MINISO Group Holding has a consensus price target of $24.51, signalling upside risk potential of 42.33%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.02 which suggests that it could grow by 19.98%. Given that MINISO Group Holding has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe MINISO Group Holding is more attractive than NIO.

MINISO Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.737, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.73%.

MINISO Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MINISO Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MINISO Group Holding quarterly revenues are $655M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. MINISO Group Holding's net income of $112M is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, MINISO Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.64x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MINISO Group Holding is 2.26x versus 0.94x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.