Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…
Sell
21
MSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.08
Seasonality move
:
-19.96%
Day range:
$3.00 - $3.07
52-week range:
$2.30 - $9.30
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.91x
P/B ratio:
0.90x
Volume:
688
Avg. volume:
3.9K
1-year change:
-58.2%
Market cap:
$582.1M
Revenue:
$639.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.50
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$32.7B | $1.76 | 6.54% | 80.5% | $164.45 |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$1.2B | $0.02 | 9.16% | -100% | $7.20 |
|
SJMHY
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
$3.02 | -- | $582.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.91x |
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$118.97 | $164.45 | $284B | 17.20x | $1.66 | 1.68% | 2.12x |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
|
$11.70 | -- | $11.7B | 19.70x | $0.26 | 5.49% | 0.93x |
|
MI
NFT
|
$2.04 | -- | $10.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$4.90 | $7.20 | $2.1B | 49.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
SJMHY
SJM Holdings
|
$0.96 | -- | $1.7B | 3,541.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
76.99% | -0.013 | 198.81% | 0.72x |
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
18.78% | -0.203 | 14.77% | 1.39x |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
|
52.9% | -1.244 | 34.57% | 0.17x |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | 3.102 | -- | 6.85x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
122.75% | 1.686 | 254.11% | 1.09x |
|
SJMHY
SJM Holdings
|
65.52% | -2.049 | 150.17% | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
$98.5M | $2.3M | -3.34% | -14.29% | 1.45% | -- |
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$16.3B | $6.6B | 9.36% | 11.03% | 20.32% | $13.9B |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
|
-- | -- | 8.2% | 16.73% | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$412.4M | $106.9M | 0.68% | -- | 7.12% | -- |
|
SJMHY
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.03% | -- | -- |
Studio City International Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 17.54%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B BABAAlibaba Group Holding41.99% $2.84 $181.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or BABA?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.96%. On the other hand Alibaba Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of $164.45 which suggests that it could grow by 38.23%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 BABAAlibaba Group Holding30 2 0 -
Is MSC or BABA More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.353, which suggesting that the stock is 135.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.240, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.005%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or BABA?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alibaba Group Holding offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding pays out 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or BABA?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are smaller than Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues of $38.9B. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is lower than Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alibaba Group Holding's PE ratio is 17.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 0.91x versus 2.12x for Alibaba Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings0.91x -- $152.9M -$27.7M BABAAlibaba Group Holding2.12x 17.20x $38.9B $6.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or CJEWY?
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of --. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group's return on equity of 16.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B CJEWYChow Tai Fook Jewellery Group-- -- $7.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or CJEWY?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.96%. On the other hand Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 CJEWYChow Tai Fook Jewellery Group0 0 0 -
Is MSC or CJEWY More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.353, which suggesting that the stock is 135.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.136%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or CJEWY?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group pays out 192.91% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or CJEWY?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are larger than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group quarterly revenues of --. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is higher than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group's net income of --. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group's PE ratio is 19.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 0.91x versus 0.93x for Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings0.91x -- $152.9M -$27.7M CJEWYChow Tai Fook Jewellery Group0.93x 19.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or MI?
NFT has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of --. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat NFT's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B MINFT-- -- $74.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or MI?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.96%. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than NFT.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 MINFT0 0 0 -
Is MSC or MI More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.353, which suggesting that the stock is 135.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 241.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or MI?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or MI?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NFT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 0.91x versus 0.48x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings0.91x -- $152.9M -$27.7M MINFT0.48x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or MLCO?
Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of -1.7%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment34.63% -$0.05 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or MLCO?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.96%. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $7.20 which suggests that it could grow by 47.01%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Melco Resorts and Entertainment, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Melco Resorts and Entertainment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment7 4 0 -
Is MSC or MLCO More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.353, which suggesting that the stock is 135.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.655%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or MLCO?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or MLCO?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of -$20.3M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 49.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 0.91x versus 0.46x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings0.91x -- $152.9M -$27.7M MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment0.46x 49.49x $1.2B -$20.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or SJMHY?
SJM Holdings has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 1.44%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B SJMHYSJM Holdings-- $0.01 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or SJMHY?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.96%. On the other hand SJM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than SJM Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 SJMHYSJM Holdings0 0 0 -
Is MSC or SJMHY More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.353, which suggesting that the stock is 135.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.537%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or SJMHY?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SJM Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or SJMHY?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are smaller than SJM Holdings quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is lower than SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SJM Holdings's PE ratio is 3,541.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 0.91x versus 0.77x for SJM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings0.91x -- $152.9M -$27.7M SJMHYSJM Holdings0.77x 3,541.33x $896.8M $12.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…
Will PayPal Stock Recover or Keep Sliding?
Payments platform behemoth PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) is going through…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
71
PEGA alert for Apr 24
Pegasystems [PEGA] is up 3.13% over the past day.
Buy
67
SMMT alert for Apr 24
Summit Therapeutics [SMMT] is up 10.38% over the past day.
Sell
36
ENPH alert for Apr 24
Enphase Energy [ENPH] is up 1.44% over the past day.
