NBHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 27.33% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 16.32%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 9.45% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.14%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 14.37%. Given that National Bank Holdings has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe National Bank Holdings is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. National Bank Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.1M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $28.2M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.03x versus 2.89x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 27.33% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 32.77%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 9.45% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 14.69%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.14%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that National Bank Holdings has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe National Bank Holdings is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Bank Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.1M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.1M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $28.2M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.03x versus 1.08x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 27.33% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 27.77%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 9.45% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.14%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that National Bank Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe National Bank Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Park National offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. National Bank Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.1M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $28.2M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while Park National's PE ratio is 19.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.03x versus 5.48x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 27.33% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 24.66%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 9.45% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.14%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.08%. Given that National Bank Holdings has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe National Bank Holdings is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.64%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. National Bank Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.1M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $28.2M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.74x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.03x versus 3.31x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.