NFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 29.64% compared to National Fuel Gas's net margin of -9%. National Fuel Gas's return on equity of 1.34% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16%.

National Fuel Gas has a consensus price target of $82.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 39.75%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than National Fuel Gas, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than National Fuel Gas.

National Fuel Gas has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.853%.

National Fuel Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 10.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. National Fuel Gas pays 237.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Fuel Gas quarterly revenues are $730M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $20.3M. National Fuel Gas's net income of $216.4M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, National Fuel Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.65x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 90.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Fuel Gas is 3.52x versus 1.72x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Epsilon Energy has a net margin of 29.64% compared to National Fuel Gas's net margin of -8.51%. National Fuel Gas's return on equity of 1.34% beat Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 1.95%.

National Fuel Gas has a consensus price target of $82.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Epsilon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.40 which suggests that it could grow by 23.17%. Given that Epsilon Energy has higher upside potential than National Fuel Gas, analysts believe Epsilon Energy is more attractive than National Fuel Gas.

National Fuel Gas has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.168, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.249%.

National Fuel Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Epsilon Energy offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. National Fuel Gas pays 237.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out 284.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Fuel Gas quarterly revenues are $730M, which are larger than Epsilon Energy quarterly revenues of $8.9M. National Fuel Gas's net income of $216.4M is higher than Epsilon Energy's net income of -$760.8K. Notably, National Fuel Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.65x while Epsilon Energy's PE ratio is 68.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Fuel Gas is 3.52x versus 4.76x for Epsilon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 29.64% compared to National Fuel Gas's net margin of 13.76%. National Fuel Gas's return on equity of 1.34% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

National Fuel Gas has a consensus price target of $82.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.27 which suggests that it could grow by 12.45%. Given that Occidental Petroleum has higher upside potential than National Fuel Gas, analysts believe Occidental Petroleum is more attractive than National Fuel Gas.

National Fuel Gas has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.337%.

National Fuel Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. National Fuel Gas pays 237.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but National Fuel Gas's is not.

National Fuel Gas quarterly revenues are $730M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. National Fuel Gas's net income of $216.4M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, National Fuel Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.65x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 17.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Fuel Gas is 3.52x versus 1.55x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 29.64% compared to National Fuel Gas's net margin of 9.52%. National Fuel Gas's return on equity of 1.34% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

National Fuel Gas has a consensus price target of $82.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than National Fuel Gas, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than National Fuel Gas.

National Fuel Gas has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

National Fuel Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. National Fuel Gas pays 237.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but National Fuel Gas's is not.

National Fuel Gas quarterly revenues are $730M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. National Fuel Gas's net income of $216.4M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, National Fuel Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.65x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Fuel Gas is 3.52x versus 1.41x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.