NOAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Highest Performances Holdings has a net margin of 19.66% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of --. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 5.7% beat Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5%.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.23, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand Highest Performances Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.289, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.932%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. Highest Performances Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings pays 17.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Highest Performances Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $95.5M, which are larger than Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings's net income of $18.8M is higher than Highest Performances Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Highest Performances Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 1.96x versus 0.33x for Highest Performances Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of 19.66% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of --. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 5.7% beat The9's return on equity of --.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.23, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than The9.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.461%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings pays 17.58% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $95.5M, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings's net income of $18.8M is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 1.96x versus 2.48x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of 19.66% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of --. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 5.7% beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.23, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.368%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings pays 17.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $95.5M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings's net income of $18.8M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 1.96x versus 3.48x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 19.66% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of 17.57%. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 5.7% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.23, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $8.03 which suggests that it could grow by 28.69%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Noah Holdings.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.894%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings pays 17.58% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $95.5M, which are smaller than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Noah Holdings's net income of $18.8M is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 34.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 1.96x versus 2.99x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.