PSTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NetApp has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 18.03%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75% beat NetApp's return on equity of 121.65%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $138.88 which suggests that it could grow by 17.61%. Given that NetApp has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe NetApp is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.734%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 169.11x while NetApp's PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 7.35x versus 3.86x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of -19.2%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75% beat Quantum's return on equity of --.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Quantum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -84.09%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than Quantum.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum has a beta of 3.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 206.472%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are larger than Quantum quarterly revenues of $70.5M. Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M is higher than Quantum's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 169.11x while Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 7.35x versus 0.53x for Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 6.65%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 33.98%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $40.34 which suggests that it could grow by 23.7%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.664%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $352.7M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 169.11x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 7.35x versus 1.31x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 12.04%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 3.4%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $88.80 which suggests that it could grow by 38.62%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 8.763% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.025%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $493M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 169.11x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 39.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 7.35x versus 1.51x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.