SNV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comerica has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 22.69%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat Comerica's return on equity of 9.06%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $62.32, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $70.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Synovus Financial has higher upside potential than Comerica, analysts believe Synovus Financial is more attractive than Comerica.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.918%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Comerica offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $811M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is lower than Comerica's net income of $184M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.73x while Comerica's PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 4.04x versus 2.60x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flushing Financial has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 17.11%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat Flushing Financial's return on equity of 3.89%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $62.32, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Flushing Financial has an analysts' consensus of $17.38 which suggests that it could grow by 19.83%. Given that Flushing Financial has higher upside potential than Synovus Financial, analysts believe Flushing Financial is more attractive than Synovus Financial.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flushing Financial has a beta of 0.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.181%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Flushing Financial offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Flushing Financial pays out 91.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than Flushing Financial quarterly revenues of $52.1M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is higher than Flushing Financial's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.73x while Flushing Financial's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 4.04x versus 2.18x for Flushing Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heartland Financial USA has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 31.56%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat Heartland Financial USA's return on equity of 4.3%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $62.32, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Heartland Financial USA has an analysts' consensus of $69.25 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that Synovus Financial has higher upside potential than Heartland Financial USA, analysts believe Synovus Financial is more attractive than Heartland Financial USA.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Financial USA has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.566%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Heartland Financial USA offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA pays out 74.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than Heartland Financial USA quarterly revenues of $203.3M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is higher than Heartland Financial USA's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.73x while Heartland Financial USA's PE ratio is 33.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 4.04x versus 4.29x for Heartland Financial USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 30.13%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $62.32, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $138.67 which suggests that it could grow by 25.7%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Synovus Financial, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Synovus Financial.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.778%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $363.9M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is higher than UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.73x while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 13.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 4.04x versus 3.84x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.