SQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DocuSign has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Block's net margin of 8.27%. Block's return on equity of 5.56% beat DocuSign's return on equity of 70.42%.

Block has a consensus price target of $97.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.69%. On the other hand DocuSign has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.13%. Given that Block has higher upside potential than DocuSign, analysts believe Block is more attractive than DocuSign.

Block has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DocuSign has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.009%.

Block has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DocuSign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Block pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DocuSign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Block quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than DocuSign quarterly revenues of $754.8M. Block's net income of $283.8M is higher than DocuSign's net income of $62.4M. Notably, Block's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.54x while DocuSign's PE ratio is 19.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Block is 2.42x versus 6.82x for DocuSign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shift4 Payments has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Block's net margin of 5.92%. Block's return on equity of 5.56% beat Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76%.

Block has a consensus price target of $97.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.69%. On the other hand Shift4 Payments has an analysts' consensus of $117.81 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Block.

Block has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Block has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shift4 Payments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Block pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shift4 Payments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Block quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues of $909.2M. Block's net income of $283.8M is higher than Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M. Notably, Block's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.54x while Shift4 Payments's PE ratio is 57.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Block is 2.42x versus 2.43x for Shift4 Payments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Block's net margin of -293.07%. Block's return on equity of 5.56% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

Block has a consensus price target of $97.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.69%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of $518.68 which suggests that it could grow by 44.81%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Block.

Block has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.477%.

Block has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Block pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Block quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. Block's net income of $283.8M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, Block's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.54x while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Block is 2.42x versus 148.54x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Block's net margin of 2.41%. Block's return on equity of 5.56% beat Okta's return on equity of -0.65%.

Block has a consensus price target of $97.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.69%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $103.55 which suggests that it could grow by 24.47%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than Block.

Block has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.076000000000009%.

Block has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Block pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Block quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $665M. Block's net income of $283.8M is higher than Okta's net income of $16M. Notably, Block's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.54x while Okta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Block is 2.42x versus 5.57x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.