SRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of -3.3% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of 3.04%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.68% beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 193.5%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.95%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Standard Motor Products, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Standard Motor Products.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.219, which suggesting that the stock is 21.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.679%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $217.9M, which are smaller than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $413.4M. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 204.86x while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.15x versus 0.43x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of -3.3% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of -0.04%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.68% beat Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 193.5%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $38.80 which suggests that it could grow by 38.87%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Gentherm.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.219, which suggesting that the stock is 21.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.928%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $217.9M, which are smaller than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $353.9M. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Gentherm's net income of -$128K. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 204.86x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.15x versus 0.60x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -3.3% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of 2.12%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.68% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 193.5%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $290.36 which suggests that it could fall by -16.49%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Tesla.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.219, which suggesting that the stock is 21.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $217.9M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 204.86x while Tesla's PE ratio is 191.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.15x versus 12.73x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -3.3% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of -207.1%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.68% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -42.3%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 193.5%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2819.71%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Stoneridge, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Stoneridge.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.219, which suggesting that the stock is 21.941% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $217.9M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 204.86x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.15x versus 0.19x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.