TOST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SentinelOne has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Toast's net margin of -37.2%. Toast's return on equity of -3.92% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.96%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $39.47, signalling upside risk potential of 5.45%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $29.69 which suggests that it could grow by 32.05%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Toast.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $210.6M. Toast's net income of $56M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$78.4M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.55x versus 9.05x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Toast's net margin of -86.68%. Toast's return on equity of -3.92% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -75.45%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $39.47, signalling upside risk potential of 5.45%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $12.36 which suggests that it could fall by -31.25%. Given that Toast has higher upside potential than SoundHound AI, analysts believe Toast is more attractive than SoundHound AI.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Toast's net income of $56M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.55x versus 81.97x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Toast's net margin of 14.99%. Toast's return on equity of -3.92% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 13.38%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $39.47, signalling upside risk potential of 5.45%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $132.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than Toast.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.187%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $628M. Toast's net income of $56M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $94.2M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 199.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.55x versus 26.29x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Toast's net margin of -1.92%. Toast's return on equity of -3.92% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $39.47, signalling upside risk potential of 5.45%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $225.77 which suggests that it could grow by 22.77%. Given that Zscaler has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Zscaler is more attractive than Toast.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.459%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $628M. Toast's net income of $56M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.55x versus 12.14x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.