VSCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVgo has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of -18.39%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08% beat EVgo's return on equity of -9.01%.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $25.05, signalling upside risk potential of 34.87%. On the other hand EVgo has an analysts' consensus of $6.46 which suggests that it could grow by 138.78%. Given that EVgo has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe EVgo is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVgo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVgo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVgo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than EVgo quarterly revenues of $67.5M. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of $193M is higher than EVgo's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.45x while EVgo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.24x versus 1.08x for EVgo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of 13.48%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.46%.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $25.05, signalling upside risk potential of 34.87%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $94.84 which suggests that it could grow by 24.68%. Given that Victoria's Secret & has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Five Below.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.534%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of $193M is higher than Five Below's net income of $187.5M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.45x while Five Below's PE ratio is 16.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.24x versus 1.08x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gap has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of 4.97%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08% beat Gap's return on equity of 28.9%.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $25.05, signalling upside risk potential of 34.87%. On the other hand Gap has an analysts' consensus of $26.19 which suggests that it could grow by 26.3%. Given that Victoria's Secret & has higher upside potential than Gap, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Gap.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gap has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.022%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gap offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap pays out 26.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Gap quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of $193M is lower than Gap's net income of $206M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.45x while Gap's PE ratio is 9.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.24x versus 0.53x for Gap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leslies has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of -25.43%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08% beat Leslies's return on equity of --.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $25.05, signalling upside risk potential of 34.87%. On the other hand Leslies has an analysts' consensus of $2.21 which suggests that it could grow by 263.77%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leslies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leslies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Leslies quarterly revenues of $175.2M. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of $193M is higher than Leslies's net income of -$44.6M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.45x while Leslies's PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.24x versus 0.08x for Leslies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.