Is Broadcom Stock Overvalued?
The semiconductor company Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is having a stellar…
Sell
20
OND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$32.24
Seasonality move
:
0.91%
Day range:
$32.24 - $32.42
52-week range:
$23.47 - $35.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
136
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
32.16%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLXY
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$32.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
$27.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.69% | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
$81.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 0.45% | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$29.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.45% | -- |
|
KLXY
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
|
$23.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.75% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$42.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0.38% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.260 | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.269 | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | 1.517 | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.032 | -- | -- |
|
KLXY
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
|
-- | 1.061 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 0.621 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLXY
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares On-Demand ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or BNGE?
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or BNGE More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or ESPO?
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or ESPO More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.753%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or FMET?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or FMET?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Metaverse ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Metaverse ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Metaverse ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or FMET More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or FMET?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fidelity Metaverse ETF offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or FMET?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Metaverse ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Metaverse ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or KLXY?
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- KLXYKraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or KLXY?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 KLXYKraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or KLXY More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or KLXY?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or KLXY?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- KLXYKraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or SOCL More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.193%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
If you’re looking for steady income, dividend stocks are a…
Will Uber Stock Recover?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x
Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 11
Mercury General [MCY] is down 19.87% over the past day.
Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 11
Aritzia [ATZAF] is up 17.63% over the past day.
