5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Buy
67
CICOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.69
Seasonality move
:
-3.94%
Day range:
$7.70 - $7.70
52-week range:
$6.09 - $9.87
Dividend yield:
11.45%
P/E ratio:
4.43x
P/S ratio:
0.97x
P/B ratio:
0.76x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2.2K
1-year change:
12.74%
Market cap:
$24B
Revenue:
$32.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.74
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$52.2M | -- | -11.32% | -- | $2.00 |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$20.9M | -$0.03 | 142.04% | -83.04% | $28.14 |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
$7.70 | -- | $24B | 4.43x | $0.37 | 11.45% | 0.97x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$0.70 | -- | $4.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.83x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$0.84 | $2.00 | $75.8M | 6.47x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.43x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$18.75 | $28.14 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 19.82x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
$5.02 | -- | $24.1M | 3.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
$1.25 | -- | $8.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
14.48% | 0.465 | -- | 1.54x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
13.06% | -1.502 | 96.59% | 7.40x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
17.84% | 1.501 | 33.33% | 0.33x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
9.06% | -0.967 | 1.3% | 2.51x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
1.33% | 0.495 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -2.716 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
$4.3B | $3.8B | 13.77% | 9.68% | 40.47% | -$3.7B |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$82.8K | -$381.1K | -7.41% | -8.7% | -90.4% | $235.3K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$3.3M | -$6.1M | 7.67% | 9.64% | -24.12% | $3.9M |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$13.9M | -$7.7M | -34.15% | -41.52% | -26.83% | -- |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOY or ATXG?
Addentax Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -102.49%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat Addentax Group's return on equity of -8.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.93 $40.3B ATXGAddentax Group7.82% -$0.19 $27.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOY or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has higher upside potential than Addentax Group, analysts believe COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is more attractive than Addentax Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group0 0 0 -
Is CICOY or ATXG More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOY or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.45%. Addentax Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 24.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOY or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than Addentax Group quarterly revenues of $1.1M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than Addentax Group's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while Addentax Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.97x versus 0.83x for Addentax Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.97x 4.43x $10.3B $3B ATXGAddentax Group0.83x -- $1.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOY or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -17.77%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.93 $40.3B CBATCBAK Energy Technology13.05% -$0.05 $146.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOY or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 137.25%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology0 0 0 -
Is CICOY or CBAT More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.659, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.851%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOY or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.45%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 24.51% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOY or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $25.4M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 6.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.97x versus 0.43x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.97x 4.43x $10.3B $3B CBATCBAK Energy Technology0.43x 6.47x $25.4M -$4.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOY or EH?
EHang Holdings has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -28.52%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -41.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.93 $40.3B EHEHang Holdings60.68% -$0.09 $144M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOY or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $28.14 which suggests that it could grow by 50.07%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 EHEHang Holdings9 0 0 -
Is CICOY or EH More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOY or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.45%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 24.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOY or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $22.8M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.5M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.97x versus 19.82x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.97x 4.43x $10.3B $3B EHEHang Holdings19.82x -- $22.8M -$6.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOY or NISN?
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.93 $40.3B NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOY or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1712.75%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0 0 0 -
Is CICOY or NISN More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.592, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.212%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOY or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.45%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 24.51% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOY or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 3.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.97x versus 0.06x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.97x 4.43x $10.3B $3B NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0.06x 3.51x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOY or YGMZ?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.93 $40.3B YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CICOY or YGMZ?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CICOY or YGMZ More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOY or YGMZ?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.45%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 24.51% of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOY or YGMZ?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.97x versus 0.05x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOYCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.97x 4.43x $10.3B $3B YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0.05x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.
Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8
Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.
Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8
LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.33% over the past day.
