CNDHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of -12.85%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 9.78%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.88 which suggests that it could grow by 12.02%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Everest Group's net income of -$593M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.89x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 45.61%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 9.77%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.03%. Given that Enstar Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Enstar Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.851%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $342M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $156M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 9.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 4.14x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 5.82%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 25.87%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $583M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 4.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.83x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of -570.56%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 85.19%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.628%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 1.23x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.