DTEAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acme United has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of 3.72%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat Acme United's return on equity of 9.74%.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 445.66%. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.39%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Acme United, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Acme United.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.115, which suggesting that the stock is 111.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.072%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 22.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Acme United quarterly revenues of $45.9M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than Acme United's net income of $1.7M. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acme United's PE ratio is 16.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.24x versus 0.85x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BioHarvest Sciences has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of -41.12%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of --.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 445.66%. On the other hand BioHarvest Sciences has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 123.75%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than BioHarvest Sciences, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than BioHarvest Sciences.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.115, which suggesting that the stock is 111.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.43%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BioHarvest Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BioHarvest Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues of $6.5M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BioHarvest Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.24x versus 4.49x for BioHarvest Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Borealis Foods has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of -62.85%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83%.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 445.66%. On the other hand Borealis Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.115, which suggesting that the stock is 111.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Borealis Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Borealis Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Borealis Foods quarterly revenues of $7.7M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Borealis Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.24x versus -- for Borealis Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sensible Meats has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of --. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat Sensible Meats's return on equity of --.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 445.66%. On the other hand Sensible Meats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Sensible Meats, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Sensible Meats.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.115, which suggesting that the stock is 111.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sensible Meats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sensible Meats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sensible Meats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sensible Meats quarterly revenues of --. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than Sensible Meats's net income of --. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sensible Meats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.24x versus -- for Sensible Meats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.