GCEI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LifeQuest World has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of --. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Clean Energy has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe Global Clean Energy is more attractive than LifeQuest World.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.483%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviri has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of -2.44%. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Enviri's return on equity of -24.69%.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enviri has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 105.94%. Given that Enviri has higher upside potential than Global Clean Energy, analysts believe Enviri is more attractive than Global Clean Energy.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviri has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.242%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enviri offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enviri pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enviri quarterly revenues of $548.3M. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than Enviri's net income of -$13.4M. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enviri's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus 0.24x for Enviri. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of -13.59%. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -23.9%.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.83 which suggests that it could grow by 192.02%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Global Clean Energy, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Global Clean Energy.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.554, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.59%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $70M. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus 0.17x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rain Oncology has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of --. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Rain Oncology's return on equity of --.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rain Oncology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Clean Energy has higher upside potential than Rain Oncology, analysts believe Global Clean Energy is more attractive than Rain Oncology.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rain Oncology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rain Oncology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rain Oncology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rain Oncology quarterly revenues of --. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than Rain Oncology's net income of --. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rain Oncology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus -- for Rain Oncology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.