5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Buy
53
HOKCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.90
Seasonality move
:
0.24%
Day range:
$0.85 - $0.86
52-week range:
$0.65 - $0.99
Dividend yield:
5.27%
P/E ratio:
22.02x
P/S ratio:
2.23x
P/B ratio:
2.15x
Volume:
5.8K
Avg. volume:
67.3K
1-year change:
13.11%
Market cap:
$15.9B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
Hong Kong and China Gas
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
Hong Kong and China Gas
|
$0.85 | -- | $15.9B | 22.02x | $0.02 | 5.27% | 2.23x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.21x | $0.02 | 6.39% | 0.54x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
$34.42 | -- | $11.9B | 6.13x | $0.88 | 5.83% | 0.85x |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
$0.05 | -- | $393.8M | 3.59x | $0.00 | 8.94% | 1.18x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
$6.75 | -- | $14.4B | 18.34x | $0.10 | 5.35% | 16.55x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
Hong Kong and China Gas
|
50.41% | -0.568 | 52.6% | 0.53x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
79.58% | 0.138 | 531.02% | 0.65x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
63.41% | -0.195 | 188.83% | 0.52x |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
65.02% | -0.976 | 355.84% | 0.60x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
2.8% | -0.211 | 2.17% | 0.68x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
Hong Kong and China Gas
|
-- | -- | 4.47% | 8.26% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | 3.15% | 9.28% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Hong Kong and China Gas vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Hong Kong and China Gas's net margin of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's return on equity of 8.26% beat CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas-- -- $16.3B CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or CGEGF?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong and China Gas has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings, analysts believe Hong Kong and China Gas is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or CGEGF More Risky?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a beta of 0.146, which suggesting that the stock is 85.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or CGEGF?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. CGN New Energy Holdings offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Hong Kong and China Gas pays 114.35% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings pays out 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hong Kong and China Gas's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or CGEGF?
Hong Kong and China Gas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong and China Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while CGN New Energy Holdings's PE ratio is 4.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong and China Gas is 2.23x versus 0.54x for CGN New Energy Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas2.23x 22.02x -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings0.54x 4.21x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or CRPJY?
China Resources Power Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Hong Kong and China Gas's net margin of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's return on equity of 8.26% beat China Resources Power Holdings's return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas-- -- $16.3B CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings-- -- $40B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or CRPJY?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong and China Gas has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings, analysts believe Hong Kong and China Gas is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas0 0 0 CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or CRPJY More Risky?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a beta of 0.146, which suggesting that the stock is 85.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings has a beta of 0.616, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or CRPJY?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. China Resources Power Holdings offers a yield of 5.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Hong Kong and China Gas pays 114.35% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings pays out 50.41% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hong Kong and China Gas's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or CRPJY?
Hong Kong and China Gas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong and China Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while China Resources Power Holdings's PE ratio is 6.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong and China Gas is 2.23x versus 0.85x for China Resources Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas2.23x 22.02x -- -- CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings0.85x 6.13x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or CWPWF?
Concord New Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to Hong Kong and China Gas's net margin of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's return on equity of 8.26% beat Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas-- -- $16.3B CWPWFConcord New Energy Group-- -- $3.4B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or CWPWF?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong and China Gas has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group, analysts believe Hong Kong and China Gas is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas0 0 0 CWPWFConcord New Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or CWPWF More Risky?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a beta of 0.146, which suggesting that the stock is 85.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or CWPWF?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Concord New Energy Group offers a yield of 8.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong and China Gas pays 114.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hong Kong and China Gas's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or CWPWF?
Hong Kong and China Gas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's net income of -- is lower than Concord New Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong and China Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Concord New Energy Group's PE ratio is 3.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong and China Gas is 2.23x versus 1.18x for Concord New Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas2.23x 22.02x -- -- CWPWFConcord New Energy Group1.18x 3.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or HGKGY?
Power Assets Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Hong Kong and China Gas's net margin of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's return on equity of 8.26% beat Power Assets Holdings's return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas-- -- $16.3B HGKGYPower Assets Holdings-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or HGKGY?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong and China Gas has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings, analysts believe Hong Kong and China Gas is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas0 0 0 HGKGYPower Assets Holdings0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or HGKGY More Risky?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a beta of 0.146, which suggesting that the stock is 85.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.426%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or HGKGY?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Power Assets Holdings offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Hong Kong and China Gas pays 114.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings pays out 98.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hong Kong and China Gas's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or HGKGY?
Hong Kong and China Gas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong and China Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Power Assets Holdings's PE ratio is 18.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong and China Gas is 2.23x versus 16.55x for Power Assets Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas2.23x 22.02x -- -- HGKGYPower Assets Holdings16.55x 18.34x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or PVLTF?
Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Hong Kong and China Gas's net margin of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's return on equity of 8.26% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas-- -- $16.3B PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or PVLTF?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong and China Gas has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe Hong Kong and China Gas is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas0 0 0 PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or PVLTF More Risky?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a beta of 0.146, which suggesting that the stock is 85.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or PVLTF?
Hong Kong and China Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong and China Gas pays 114.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or PVLTF?
Hong Kong and China Gas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong and China Gas's net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong and China Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong and China Gas is 2.23x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYHong Kong and China Gas2.23x 22.02x -- -- PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.
Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8
Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.
Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8
LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.33% over the past day.
