Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Like most of its peers in the semiconductor industry, Micron…
Buy
69
IMBBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$39.50
Seasonality move
:
1.49%
Day range:
$38.99 - $39.43
52-week range:
$21.88 - $39.43
Dividend yield:
5.01%
P/E ratio:
9.60x
P/S ratio:
0.82x
P/B ratio:
4.48x
Volume:
505K
Avg. volume:
176.5K
1-year change:
80.75%
Market cap:
$32.6B
Revenue:
$41.1B
EPS (TTM):
$3.86
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $34.00 |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $44.54 |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$5B | -- | -- | -- | $93.36 |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $124.14 |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
$68.3M | -$0.11 | -- | -- | $4.85 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
$39.15 | $34.00 | $32.6B | 9.60x | $0.70 | 5.01% | 0.82x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
$41.83 | $44.54 | $91.8B | 24.57x | $0.75 | 7.16% | 2.83x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$87.90 | $93.36 | $40.4B | 26.62x | $1.30 | 2.38% | 1.85x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
$108.20 | $124.14 | $60.1B | 16.77x | $1.62 | 3.83% | 2.98x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
$12.92 | -- | $44.1B | 25.12x | $0.31 | 4.07% | 2.52x |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
$2.62 | $4.85 | $321.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
61.51% | 0.473 | 45.86% | 0.33x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
42.28% | 0.636 | 56.73% | 0.38x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
55.58% | 0.125 | 30.78% | 0.57x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
67.87% | 0.238 | 29.86% | 0.65x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
55.51% | 0.318 | 25.4% | 0.36x |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
20.1% | 0.083 | 29.71% | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | 17.1% | 44.78% | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | 3.34% | 5.79% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
-- | -- | 7.24% | 16.39% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | 10.69% | 29.79% | -- | -- |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | 8.84% | 18.38% | -- | -- |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
-- | -- | -4.62% | -5.64% | -- | -- |
Imperial Brands PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or BTI?
British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC-- -- $108.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -13.16%. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of $44.54 which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC0 1 1 -
Is IMBBY or BTI More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.019%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 7.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco PLC's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is 24.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 2.83x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 9.60x -- -- BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC2.83x 24.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 16.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -13.16%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $93.36 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC7 3 0 -
Is IMBBY or CCEP More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.755%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 64.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 1.85x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 9.60x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC1.85x 26.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or DEO?
Diageo PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 29.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B DEODiageo PLC-- -- $34.1B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -13.16%. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $124.14 which suggests that it could grow by 14.74%. Given that Diageo PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Diageo PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 DEODiageo PLC3 2 1 -
Is IMBBY or DEO More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.844%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 16.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 2.98x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 9.60x -- -- DEODiageo PLC2.98x 16.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or RBGLY?
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 18.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC-- -- $18.9B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or RBGLY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -13.16%. On the other hand Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Imperial Brands PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Imperial Brands PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC0 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or RBGLY More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.521%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or RBGLY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays out 96.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or RBGLY?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's PE ratio is 25.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 2.52x for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 9.60x -- -- RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC2.52x 25.12x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or WALD?
Waldencast PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Waldencast PLC's return on equity of -5.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B WALDWaldencast PLC-- -- $896.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or WALD?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -13.16%. On the other hand Waldencast PLC has an analysts' consensus of $4.85 which suggests that it could grow by 85.12%. Given that Waldencast PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Waldencast PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 WALDWaldencast PLC3 2 0 -
Is IMBBY or WALD More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waldencast PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or WALD?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Waldencast PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Waldencast PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or WALD?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Waldencast PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Waldencast PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Waldencast PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 1.05x for Waldencast PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 9.60x -- -- WALDWaldencast PLC1.05x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…
How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?
YieldMax’s MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is a high-yield…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
91
TORXF alert for Apr 17
Torex Gold Resources [TORXF] is down 2.15% over the past day.
Sell
25
BULZ alert for Apr 17
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innov 3X Levd ETN [BULZ] is down 1.92% over the past day.
Sell
44
VIST alert for Apr 17
Vista Energy SAB de CV [VIST] is up 6.93% over the past day.
