KDDIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 12.29% compared to KDDI's net margin of 7.67%. KDDI's return on equity of 11.27% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.99%.

KDDI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KDDI has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe KDDI is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

KDDI has a beta of 0.097, which suggesting that the stock is 90.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.135%.

KDDI has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. KDDI pays 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $539.5M. KDDI's net income of $1.2B is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $41.4M. Notably, KDDI's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 22.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI is 1.83x versus 1.50x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 12.29% compared to KDDI's net margin of 8.55%. KDDI's return on equity of 11.27% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 11.2%.

KDDI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.99%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than KDDI.

KDDI has a beta of 0.097, which suggesting that the stock is 90.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.137, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.308%.

KDDI has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. KDDI pays 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $22.7B. KDDI's net income of $1.2B is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B. Notably, KDDI's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI is 1.83x versus 0.94x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 12.29% compared to KDDI's net margin of --. KDDI's return on equity of 11.27% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

KDDI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KDDI has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe KDDI is more attractive than PicoCELA.

KDDI has a beta of 0.097, which suggesting that the stock is 90.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KDDI has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KDDI pays 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. KDDI's net income of $1.2B is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, KDDI's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI is 1.83x versus 2.93x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 12.29% compared to KDDI's net margin of --. KDDI's return on equity of 11.27% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

KDDI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KDDI has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe KDDI is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

KDDI has a beta of 0.097, which suggesting that the stock is 90.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KDDI has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KDDI pays 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. KDDI's net income of $1.2B is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, KDDI's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI is 1.83x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.