MHVYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of 6.75%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.36% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.83%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.912%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.98x versus 0.66x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of -3.6%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.36% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.57 which suggests that it could fall by -4.36%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.954%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 53.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.98x versus 1.25x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of --. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.36% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.98x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of 9.53%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.36% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.56%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is more attractive than SECOM.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.489, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.125%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while SECOM's PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.98x versus 2.92x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.