Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…
Sell
38
MQBKY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$125.55
Seasonality move
:
4.75%
Day range:
$123.76 - $127.94
52-week range:
$98.20 - $165.98
Dividend yield:
3.4%
P/E ratio:
19.06x
P/S ratio:
11.08x
P/B ratio:
2.14x
Volume:
32.8K
Avg. volume:
50.4K
1-year change:
3.92%
Market cap:
$47.9B
Revenue:
$4.1B
EPS (TTM):
$6.53
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $74.40 |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$158.2M | $0.13 | 207.79% | 92.73% | $19.48 |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
$125.68 | -- | $47.9B | 19.06x | $1.71 | 3.4% | 11.08x |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
$0.0550 | -- | $2.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
$25.30 | -- | $14.8B | 28.05x | $0.45 | 1.78% | 4.99x |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
$106.52 | $74.40 | $178.1B | 27.92x | $1.41 | 2.94% | 10.11x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$6.30 | $19.48 | $1.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.93x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
$0.0027 | -- | $1.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
80.78% | 1.902 | 153.8% | 0.57x |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
-- | 4.677 | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
45.73% | 0.495 | 13.16% | 1.44x |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
73.03% | 1.462 | 79.25% | 2.95x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
19.83% | 7.469 | 15.18% | 0.86x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -11.476 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | 2.02% | 11.18% | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | 13.84% | 26.84% | -- | -- |
|
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
|
-- | -- | 3.73% | 13.22% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$110.6M | $16.3M | -5.24% | -5.61% | 23.93% | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Macquarie Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or CDBT?
China Dasheng Biotechnology has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18% beat China Dasheng Biotechnology's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B CDBTChina Dasheng Biotechnology-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or CDBT?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Dasheng Biotechnology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Macquarie Group has higher upside potential than China Dasheng Biotechnology, analysts believe Macquarie Group is more attractive than China Dasheng Biotechnology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 CDBTChina Dasheng Biotechnology0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or CDBT More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, which suggesting that the stock is 48.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Dasheng Biotechnology has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.797%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or CDBT?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. China Dasheng Biotechnology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Macquarie Group pays 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. China Dasheng Biotechnology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or CDBT?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Dasheng Biotechnology quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than China Dasheng Biotechnology's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while China Dasheng Biotechnology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.08x versus -- for China Dasheng Biotechnology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.08x 19.06x -- -- CDBTChina Dasheng Biotechnology-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or CMSQY?
Computershare has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18% beat Computershare's return on equity of 26.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B CMSQYComputershare-- -- $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or CMSQY?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Computershare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Macquarie Group has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe Macquarie Group is more attractive than Computershare.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 CMSQYComputershare0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or CMSQY More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, which suggesting that the stock is 48.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.395%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or CMSQY?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Computershare offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Macquarie Group pays 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare pays out 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or CMSQY?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than Computershare's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Computershare's PE ratio is 28.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.08x versus 4.99x for Computershare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.08x 19.06x -- -- CMSQYComputershare4.99x 28.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or CMWAY?
Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18% beat Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B CMWAYCommonwealth Bank of Australia-- -- $173.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or CMWAY?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Commonwealth Bank of Australia has an analysts' consensus of $74.40 which suggests that it could fall by -30.15%. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Macquarie Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 CMWAYCommonwealth Bank of Australia0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or CMWAY More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, which suggesting that the stock is 48.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.457%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or CMWAY?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Macquarie Group pays 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays out 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or CMWAY?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Commonwealth Bank of Australia's PE ratio is 27.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.08x versus 10.11x for Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.08x 19.06x -- -- CMWAYCommonwealth Bank of Australia10.11x 27.92x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of 16.06%. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B IRENIREN94.06% $0.09 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or IREN?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $19.48 which suggests that it could grow by 209.16%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Macquarie Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 IRENIREN8 1 0 -
Is MQBKY or IREN More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, which suggesting that the stock is 48.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or IREN?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Macquarie Group pays 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or IREN?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.08x versus 3.93x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.08x 19.06x -- -- IRENIREN3.93x -- $117.5M $18.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns MQBKY or SIPN?
SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Macquarie Group's net margin of --. Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MQBKY or SIPN?
Macquarie Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Macquarie Group has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Macquarie Group is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 SIPNSIPP International Industries0 0 0 -
Is MQBKY or SIPN More Risky?
Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, which suggesting that the stock is 48.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.536%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MQBKY or SIPN?
Macquarie Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Macquarie Group pays 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MQBKY or SIPN?
Macquarie Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Macquarie Group's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Macquarie Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Macquarie Group is 11.08x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MQBKYMacquarie Group11.08x 19.06x -- -- SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…
Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
48
FI alert for Apr 25
Fiserv [FI] is up 0.33% over the past day.
Buy
66
FARO alert for Apr 25
Faro Technologies [FARO] is up 0.93% over the past day.
Buy
55
PI alert for Apr 25
Impinj [PI] is up 2.15% over the past day.
