MZHOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Mizuho Financial Group's net margin of 29.16%. Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.47% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

Mizuho Financial Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.18%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Mizuho Financial Group, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Mizuho Financial Group.

Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.621%.

Mizuho Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mizuho Financial Group pays 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Mizuho Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.54x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mizuho Financial Group is 2.60x versus 3.21x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Mizuho Financial Group's net margin of 17.65%. Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.47% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66%.

Mizuho Financial Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.16 which suggests that it could grow by 30.16%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mizuho Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mizuho Financial Group.

Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.284%.

Mizuho Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mizuho Financial Group pays 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M. Notably, Mizuho Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.54x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 7.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mizuho Financial Group is 2.60x versus 1.50x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.