NABZY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of 16.06%. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 2.55%. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.30 which suggests that it could grow by 243.99%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than National Australia Bank, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than National Australia Bank.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.19x versus 3.68x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 2.55%. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.19x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35%.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 2.55%. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Strategic Elements.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.19x versus 1,864.39x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85%.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 2.55%. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 2.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.19x versus 2.08x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.