Financhill
Sell
9

NONOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$87.80
Seasonality move :
9.09%
Day range:
$83.80 - $87.55
52-week range:
$79.15 - $149.55
Dividend yield:
1.7%
P/E ratio:
27.56x
P/S ratio:
9.65x
P/B ratio:
20.92x
Volume:
3.1K
Avg. volume:
69.4K
1-year change:
-19.54%
Market cap:
$377.7B
Revenue:
$33.7B
EPS (TTM):
$3.09

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NONOF
Novo Nordisk AS
$11.1B -- 19.31% -- --
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
$106.9M -$1.31 -31.79% -15.93% $191.30
GLTO
Galecto
-- -$2.82 -- -51.46% --
GMAB
Genmab AS
$877.6M $0.39 29.03% 152.19% $36.56
LLY
Eli Lilly and
$14B $5.43 49.68% 124.93% $984.05
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NONOF
Novo Nordisk AS
$85.04 -- $377.7B 27.56x $0.52 1.7% 9.65x
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
$134.43 $191.30 $8B -- $0.00 0% 21.63x
GLTO
Galecto
$5.28 -- $7M -- $0.00 0% --
GMAB
Genmab AS
$22.19 $36.56 $14.1B 21.09x $0.00 0% 5.01x
LLY
Eli Lilly and
$787.22 $984.05 $747.3B 85.10x $1.30 0.66% 17.42x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NONOF
Novo Nordisk AS
32.1% 1.212 1.64% 0.74x
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
114.08% 1.789 9.87% 0.81x
GLTO
Galecto
-- 1.479 -- --
GMAB
Genmab AS
-- 0.544 -- 5.15x
LLY
Eli Lilly and
68.61% 1.159 3.9% 0.63x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NONOF
Novo Nordisk AS
$8.8B $5B 65.63% 88.95% 49.37% $4.7B
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
$51.3M -$106.4M -89.94% -880.05% -125.93% -$110.6M
GLTO
Galecto
-- -$3.8M -- -- -- -$3.7M
GMAB
Genmab AS
$776.2M $312.3M 14.86% 14.86% 31.35% $301.5M
LLY
Eli Lilly and
$9.3B $4.4B 21.5% 66.4% 15.57% -$458.9M

Novo Nordisk AS vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NONOF or ASND?

    Ascendis Pharma AS has a net margin of 38.28% compared to Novo Nordisk AS's net margin of -171.53%. Novo Nordisk AS's return on equity of 88.95% beat Ascendis Pharma AS's return on equity of -880.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    84.14% $0.90 $26.6B
    ASND
    Ascendis Pharma AS
    80.63% -$1.89 $772.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About NONOF or ASND?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Ascendis Pharma AS has an analysts' consensus of $191.30 which suggests that it could grow by 42.3%. Given that Ascendis Pharma AS has higher upside potential than Novo Nordisk AS, analysts believe Ascendis Pharma AS is more attractive than Novo Nordisk AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    0 0 0
    ASND
    Ascendis Pharma AS
    12 1 0
  • Is NONOF or ASND More Risky?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ascendis Pharma AS has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.145%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NONOF or ASND?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Ascendis Pharma AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Nordisk AS pays 37.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Ascendis Pharma AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NONOF or ASND?

    Novo Nordisk AS quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Ascendis Pharma AS quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Novo Nordisk AS's net income of $4B is higher than Ascendis Pharma AS's net income of -$109.1M. Notably, Novo Nordisk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while Ascendis Pharma AS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Nordisk AS is 9.65x versus 21.63x for Ascendis Pharma AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    9.65x 27.56x $10.5B $4B
    ASND
    Ascendis Pharma AS
    21.63x -- $63.6M -$109.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns NONOF or GLTO?

    Galecto has a net margin of 38.28% compared to Novo Nordisk AS's net margin of --. Novo Nordisk AS's return on equity of 88.95% beat Galecto's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    84.14% $0.90 $26.6B
    GLTO
    Galecto
    -- -$3.39 --
  • What do Analysts Say About NONOF or GLTO?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Galecto has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.39%. Given that Galecto has higher upside potential than Novo Nordisk AS, analysts believe Galecto is more attractive than Novo Nordisk AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    0 0 0
    GLTO
    Galecto
    0 0 0
  • Is NONOF or GLTO More Risky?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galecto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NONOF or GLTO?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Galecto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Nordisk AS pays 37.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Galecto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NONOF or GLTO?

    Novo Nordisk AS quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Galecto quarterly revenues of --. Novo Nordisk AS's net income of $4B is higher than Galecto's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Novo Nordisk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while Galecto's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Nordisk AS is 9.65x versus -- for Galecto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    9.65x 27.56x $10.5B $4B
    GLTO
    Galecto
    -- -- -- -$3.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns NONOF or GMAB?

    Genmab AS has a net margin of 38.28% compared to Novo Nordisk AS's net margin of 22.85%. Novo Nordisk AS's return on equity of 88.95% beat Genmab AS's return on equity of 14.86%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    84.14% $0.90 $26.6B
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    95.07% $0.29 $4.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About NONOF or GMAB?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Genmab AS has an analysts' consensus of $36.56 which suggests that it could grow by 64.74%. Given that Genmab AS has higher upside potential than Novo Nordisk AS, analysts believe Genmab AS is more attractive than Novo Nordisk AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    0 0 0
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    2 5 0
  • Is NONOF or GMAB More Risky?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genmab AS has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.369%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NONOF or GMAB?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Genmab AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Nordisk AS pays 37.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Genmab AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NONOF or GMAB?

    Novo Nordisk AS quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Genmab AS quarterly revenues of $816.4M. Novo Nordisk AS's net income of $4B is higher than Genmab AS's net income of $186.6M. Notably, Novo Nordisk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while Genmab AS's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Nordisk AS is 9.65x versus 5.01x for Genmab AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    9.65x 27.56x $10.5B $4B
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    5.01x 21.09x $816.4M $186.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns NONOF or LLY?

    Eli Lilly and has a net margin of 38.28% compared to Novo Nordisk AS's net margin of 8.48%. Novo Nordisk AS's return on equity of 88.95% beat Eli Lilly and's return on equity of 66.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    84.14% $0.90 $26.6B
    LLY
    Eli Lilly and
    81.02% $1.07 $45.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About NONOF or LLY?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.94%. On the other hand Eli Lilly and has an analysts' consensus of $984.05 which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Eli Lilly and has higher upside potential than Novo Nordisk AS, analysts believe Eli Lilly and is more attractive than Novo Nordisk AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    0 0 0
    LLY
    Eli Lilly and
    15 6 0
  • Is NONOF or LLY More Risky?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eli Lilly and has a beta of 0.413, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.729%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NONOF or LLY?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Eli Lilly and offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Novo Nordisk AS pays 37.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Eli Lilly and pays out 77.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NONOF or LLY?

    Novo Nordisk AS quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are smaller than Eli Lilly and quarterly revenues of $11.4B. Novo Nordisk AS's net income of $4B is higher than Eli Lilly and's net income of $970.3M. Notably, Novo Nordisk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while Eli Lilly and's PE ratio is 85.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Nordisk AS is 9.65x versus 17.42x for Eli Lilly and. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NONOF
    Novo Nordisk AS
    9.65x 27.56x $10.5B $4B
    LLY
    Eli Lilly and
    17.42x 85.10x $11.4B $970.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?

The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…

Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?

Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…

Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?

General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10

IonQ [IONQ] is up 11.01% over the past day.

Sell
45
COLL alert for Jan 10

Collegium Pharmaceutical [COLL] is down 1.05% over the past day.

Sell
30
EDN alert for Jan 10

Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA [EDN] is down 0.77% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock