RMTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to RM2 International's net margin of -384.5%. RM2 International's return on equity of -- beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03%.

RM2 International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6150%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2016.4%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Liquidmetal Technologies, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Liquidmetal Technologies.

RM2 International has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.761%.

RM2 International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RM2 International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RM2 International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $129K. RM2 International's net income of -- is lower than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K. Notably, RM2 International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is 94,500.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RM2 International is 0.02x versus 100.79x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paul Mueller has a net margin of -- compared to RM2 International's net margin of --. RM2 International's return on equity of -- beat Paul Mueller's return on equity of --.

RM2 International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6150%. On the other hand Paul Mueller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

RM2 International has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.254, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.645%.

RM2 International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paul Mueller offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. RM2 International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RM2 International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paul Mueller quarterly revenues of --. RM2 International's net income of -- is lower than Paul Mueller's net income of --. Notably, RM2 International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paul Mueller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RM2 International is 0.02x versus -- for Paul Mueller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to RM2 International's net margin of --. RM2 International's return on equity of -- beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.

RM2 International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6150%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.

RM2 International has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RM2 International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. RM2 International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RM2 International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. RM2 International's net income of -- is lower than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, RM2 International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RM2 International is 0.02x versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of -- compared to RM2 International's net margin of -0.33%. RM2 International's return on equity of -- beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

RM2 International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6150%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.49%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Proto Labs.

RM2 International has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.383%.

RM2 International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RM2 International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RM2 International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. RM2 International's net income of -- is lower than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, RM2 International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 53.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RM2 International is 0.02x versus 1.76x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.