SPXCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chenghe Acquisition II has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of --. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat Chenghe Acquisition II's return on equity of --.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chenghe Acquisition II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Exchange has higher upside potential than Chenghe Acquisition II, analysts believe Singapore Exchange is more attractive than Chenghe Acquisition II.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chenghe Acquisition II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Chenghe Acquisition II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Chenghe Acquisition II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chenghe Acquisition II quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than Chenghe Acquisition II's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.57x while Chenghe Acquisition II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 12.17x versus -- for Chenghe Acquisition II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BitFuFu has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of 22.52%. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat BitFuFu's return on equity of 50.81%.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BitFuFu has an analysts' consensus of $8.64 which suggests that it could grow by 148.13%. Given that BitFuFu has higher upside potential than Singapore Exchange, analysts believe BitFuFu is more attractive than Singapore Exchange.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitFuFu has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. BitFuFu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. BitFuFu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BitFuFu quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than BitFuFu's net income of $22.3M. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.57x while BitFuFu's PE ratio is 10.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 12.17x versus 1.25x for BitFuFu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lion Group Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of --. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat Lion Group Holding's return on equity of -50.99%.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lion Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Exchange has higher upside potential than Lion Group Holding, analysts believe Singapore Exchange is more attractive than Lion Group Holding.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lion Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Lion Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Lion Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lion Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than Lion Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.57x while Lion Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 12.17x versus 0.02x for Lion Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Acquisition Corp II has a net margin of -- compared to Singapore Exchange's net margin of --. Singapore Exchange's return on equity of 34.64% beat RF Acquisition Corp II's return on equity of --.

Singapore Exchange has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RF Acquisition Corp II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Exchange has higher upside potential than RF Acquisition Corp II, analysts believe Singapore Exchange is more attractive than RF Acquisition Corp II.

Singapore Exchange has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Acquisition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. RF Acquisition Corp II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Exchange pays 61.04% of its earnings as a dividend. RF Acquisition Corp II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Exchange quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RF Acquisition Corp II quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Exchange's net income of -- is lower than RF Acquisition Corp II's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Singapore Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.57x while RF Acquisition Corp II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Exchange is 12.17x versus -- for RF Acquisition Corp II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.