TDHOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 8.56% compared to T&D Holdings's net margin of 29.97%. T&D Holdings's return on equity of 10.21% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.47%.

T&D Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.92%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than T&D Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than T&D Holdings.

T&D Holdings has a beta of 0.248, which suggesting that the stock is 75.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.756%.

T&D Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. T&D Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.3B. T&D Holdings's net income of $352.3M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, T&D Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 10.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings is 0.68x versus 2.61x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 8.56% compared to T&D Holdings's net margin of 29.16%. T&D Holdings's return on equity of 10.21% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

T&D Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.18%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than T&D Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than T&D Holdings.

T&D Holdings has a beta of 0.248, which suggesting that the stock is 75.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.621%.

T&D Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. T&D Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. T&D Holdings's net income of $352.3M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, T&D Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings is 0.68x versus 3.21x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 8.56% compared to T&D Holdings's net margin of 17.65%. T&D Holdings's return on equity of 10.21% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66%.

T&D Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.16 which suggests that it could grow by 30.16%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than T&D Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than T&D Holdings.

T&D Holdings has a beta of 0.248, which suggesting that the stock is 75.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.284%.

T&D Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. T&D Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. T&D Holdings's net income of $352.3M is lower than Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M. Notably, T&D Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 7.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.50x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.