APA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 20.18%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 26.79%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $49.94 which suggests that it could grow by 43.96%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than APA, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than APA.

APA has a beta of 3.162, which suggesting that the stock is 216.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.442%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 49.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $812M. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.34x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.87x versus 1.39x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 24.92%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $214.33 which suggests that it could grow by 24.31%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

APA has a beta of 3.162, which suggesting that the stock is 216.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.947%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.34x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.87x versus 3.33x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 15.8%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 13.88%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $62.18 which suggests that it could grow by 20.62%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

APA has a beta of 3.162, which suggesting that the stock is 216.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.699%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $7.2B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $1.1B. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.34x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 13.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.87x versus 1.82x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 9.81%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.06 which suggests that it could grow by 19.49%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

APA has a beta of 3.162, which suggesting that the stock is 216.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.284%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.34x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.87x versus 1.34x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.